Solutions and comments.
-
79.
-
Let
,
,
be three positive real numbers.
A sequence
is defined, for
by
Determine all such sequences whose entries consist solely
of positive integers.
Solution 1. Let the first three terms of the sequence be
,
,
. Then it can be readily checked that the sequence
must have period 8, and that the entries cycle through the
following:
For all of these entries to be positive integers, it is necessary
that
be divisible by
,
be divisible by
and
be divisible by
. In particular,
and
.
Without loss of generality, we can assume that the smallest
entry in the sequence is
. Then,
and
whence
Hence
so that either
or
The latter yields
so that
.
Suppose that
. Then
.
Since
divides
and
, it must divide their difference,
which cannot exceed 4. Hence
or
must be one of 1, 2, 3, 4. Similarly,
or
must be one of 1, 2, 3, 4.
If
, then
and so
divides 4. We get the periods
The case
yields essentially the same periods.
Otherwise,
and we find the additional
possible period
For each period,
can start anywhere.
Suppose that
. Then
,
so that
must divide some number not exceeding 6. Similarly,
cannot exceed 6. If
,
then
and so
; this yields the period
already noted. If
, then
must be
2, 3 or 6, and we obtain
; the possibilities
do not work. If
,
, which does not work.
If
, then
and we get a period already noted.
If
, then
, which does not work.
Hence there are five possible cycles and the sequence can begin
at any term in the cycle:
Solution 2. [O. Ivrii] We show that the sequence
contains a term that does not exceed 2. Suppose that
none of
,
and
is less than 3.
Let
max
. Then,
noting that
is an integer and that
, we deduce that
so
and
so that max
. If
, we
repeat the process to get a strictly lower bound on the next two terms.
Eventually, we obtain two consecutive terms whose maximum is
less than 3. In fact, we can deduce that there is an entry
equal to either 1 or 2 arbitrarily far out in the sequence.
Suppose, from some point on in the sequence, there is no term
equal to 1. Then there are three consecutive terms
.
The previous term is
and the following term is
, so that
divides
and
divides
.
Since
,
divides two numbers that
differ by at most 6; similarly with
. Hence, neither
nor
exceeds 6. Testing out possibilities leads to
.
Finally, we suppose that the sequence has three consecutive terms
and by similar arguments are led to the sequences
obtained in the first solution.
Comment. C. Lau established that
and thereby obtained the periodicity.
R. Barrington Leigh showed that, if all terms of the sequence
were at least equal to 2, then the sequence
defined
by
max
satisfies
.
Since the same recursion defines the sequence ``going backwards'',
we also have
, for all
. Hence
is a constant sequence, and so
is
either constant or has period 2. It is straightforward to
rule out the constant possibility. If the periodic segment
of the sequence is
, then
or
and we are led to the segment
.
Otherwise, there is a 1 in the sequence and we can conclude
as before.
-
80.
-
Prove that, for each positive integer
, the
series
converges to twice an odd integer not less than
.
Solution 1. Since the series consists of nonnegative
terms, we can establish its convergence by eventually showing
that it is dominated term by term by a geometric series with
common ratio less than 1. Noting that
for
sufficiently large, we find that for large
,
and the
th term of the series is
dominated by
. Thus the sum of the series is
defined for each nonnegative integer
.
For nonnegative integers
, let
Then
and
whence
An induction argument establishes that
is twice an odd integer.
Observe that
,
,
and
.
We prove by induction that, for each
,
from which the desired result will follow. Suppose that
we have established this for
. Now
For each positive integer
,
When
, we get inside the square
brackets the quantity
while when
, we get
Hence
Solution 2. Define
as in the foregoing solution.
Then, for
,
whence
It is easily checked that
(mod 4)
for
. As an induction hypothesis, suppose
this holds for
. Then,
modulo 4, the right side is congruent to
and the desired result follows.
For
,
since each term in the numerator of the latter fraction
exceeds each corresponding term in the denominator.
Solution 3. [of the first part using an idea of P. Gyrya]
Let
be a differentiable function
and let
be the differentiation operator. Define the
operator
by
Suppose that
.
Then, it is standard that
has a power series
expansion obtained by term-by-term differentiation that
converges absolutely for
. By induction,
it can be shown that the series given in the problem is,
for each nonnegative integer
,
.
It is straightforward to verify that
In general, a straightforward induction argument yields that
for each positive integer
,
for some integers
. Hence
yielding the desired result.
-
81.
-
Suppose that
and that
, where
is the greatest integer not exceeding
and the
fractional part
satisfies
.
Define
-
-
(a) Determine the smallest number
such that
for each
.
-
-
(b) Let
be given, and for
, define
. Prove that
exists.
81.
Solution. (a) Let
, where
and
. Then
which is less than 2 because
by the arithmetic-geometric means inequality. Hence
for each value of
. Taking
,
we find that
whence
.
(b) In determining the fate of
, note that after the
first entry, the sequence lies in the interval
. So,
without loss of generality, we may assume that
.
If
, then each
and the limit is 1. For the rest,
note that
simplifies to
on
. The key point now is to observe that
there is exactly one value
between 1 and 2 for which
,
when
and
when
. Assume these facts for a moment. A derivative
check reveals that
is strictly increasing on
,
so that for
,
, so that
the iterates
constitute a bounded, increasing
sequence when
which must have a limit.
(In fact, this limit must be a fixed point of
and so
must be
.) A similar argument shows that, if
,
then the sequence of iterates constitute a decreasing convergent
sequence (with limit
).
It remains to show that a unique fixed point
exists.
Let
with
. Then it can be checked that
if and only if
or
. Since the left side
is strictly increasing in
, takes the value
when
and the value
when
, the equation is satified for exactly
one value of
in
; now let
. The
value of
turns out to be about 1.375, (Note that
if and only if
.)
-
82.
-
(a) A regular pentagon has side length
and diagonal length
. Prove that
-
-
(b) A regular heptagon (polygon with seven equal
sides and seven equal angles) has diagonals of two
different lengths. Let
be the length of a side,
be the length of a shorter diagonal and
be the
length of a longer diagonal of a regular heptagon
(so that
). Prove that:
and
82.
Solution 1. (a) Let
be the regular
pentagon, and let triangle
be rotated about
so that
falls on
and
falls on
. Then
is a straight angle and triangle
is similar
to triangle
. Therefore
so that
, as desired.
(b) Let
be consecutive vertices of
the regular heptagon. Let
,
and
have respective lengths
,
,
, and let
. Then
, the length
of
, of
and of
is
, the length of
is c,
, since the angles
are subtended by equal chords of the circumcircle of the heptagon,
,
and
.
Triangles
and
can be glued together along
and
(with
on
) to form a triangle similar to
, whence
Triangles
and
can be glued together along
and
(with
on
) to form a triangle similar to
, whence
Equation (2) can be rewritten as
. whence
Substituting this into (1) yields
which simplifies to
Note also from (1) that
.
Solution 2. (b) [R. Barrington Leigh] Let the heptagon be
; let
and
intersect at
,
and
and
intersect at
. Observe that
,
,
,
,
,
. From similarity of
triangles, we obtain the following:
Adding these equations in pairs yields
and
The desired result follows from these equations.
Solution 3. (b) [of the second result by J. Chui]
Let the heptagon be
and
.
Using the Law of Cosines in the indicated
triangles
and
, we obtain the following:
from which, since
,
or
Examining triangles
and
, we find that
and
, so that
Examining triangles
and
, we find that
and
,
so that
Adding equations (1), (2), (3) yields
By Ptolemy's Theorem, the sum of the products of pairs of
opposite sides of a concylic quadrilaterial is equal to the
product of the diagonals. Applying this to the
quadrilaterals
and
, respectively, yields
and
, whence
and
we find that
Solution 4. [of the second result by X. Jin]
By considering isosceles triangles
with side-base pairs
,
and
, we find
that
,
,
, where
. Then
Now,
so that
.
Hence
.
Solution 5. (b) There is no loss of generality in assuming that the
vertices of the heptagon are placed at the seventh roots of unity on
the unit circle in the complex plane. Then
be the fundamental seventh root
of unity. Then
,
and
,
,
are pairs of complex conjugates. We have that
It follows from this that
whence
Also
whence
Solution 6. (b) Suppose that the circumradius of the
heptagon is 1. By considering isosceles triangles with base
equal to the sides or diagonals of the heptagon and apex at the
centre of the circumcircle, we see that
where
is half the angle subtended
at the circumcentre by each side of the heptagon.
Observe that
where
is the fundamental primitive root of unity.
We have that
whence
Also
whence
-
83.
-
Let
be a circle with centre
and radius 1, and let
be a closed
convex region inside
. Suppose from each point
on
, we can draw two rays tangent to
meeting at an angle of
. Describe
.
Solution. Let
be an arbitrary point on the
circumference of
. Draw rays
,
,
tangent to
; let
and
intersect
at
. Since
,
and
is equilateral
and contains
. Suppose, if possible, that
lies strictly inside the circle. Let
be the second ray
from
tangent to
. Then
,
so
is parallel to
and lies strictly on the opposite
side of
to
; thus, it cannot be tangent to
and we have a contradiction. Similarly, if
lies strictly outside the circle, the second ray from
,
, tangent to
is parallel to and distinct from
. We have that
is tangent to
,
and
, an impossibility since
, within the circle, lies
between
and
.
Hence
and
is an equilateral triangle containing
with all its sides tangent to
. Since
is arbitrary,
is contained within the intersection
of all such triangles, namely the circle
with centre
and radius 1/2, and every chord of the given circle tangent
to
has length
. If
were a
proper subset of
, there would be a point
on the circumference of
outside
. and
a tangent of
separating
from
. This
tangent chord would intersect the interior of
and so
be longer than
, yielding a contradiction. Hence
must be the circle
.
-
84.
-
Let
be an acute-angled triangle,
with a point
inside. Let
,
,
be
respectively the reflected image of
with respect
to axes
,
,
. Prove that
is the
orthocentre of
if and only if
,
,
lie on the circumcircle of
,
Solution 1. Suppose that
is the orthocentre of
. Let
,
,
be the respective feet
of the altitudes from
,
,
. Since
right
bisects
,
and so
. Thus
so that
is concyclic and
lies on the circumcircle
of
. Similarly
and
lie on the circumcircle.
Now suppose that
lie on the circumcircle. Let
,
,
be the respective
reflections of the circumcircle about the axes
,
,
. These three circles intersect in the point
.
If
is the orthocentre of the triangle, then by the
first part of the solution, the reflective image of
about the three axes lies on the circumcircle, so that
belongs to
,
,
and
or else
is a common chord of the three
circles. But the latter does not hold, as the common chords
,
and
of pairs of the circles intersect only
in
.
Solution 2. Let
be the orthocentre, and
,
,
the pedal points as defined in the first solution.
Since
is concyclic
and so
is concyclic. A similar argument holds for
and
.
[A. Lin] Suppose that
,
,
are on the circumcircle.
>From the reflection about
,
.
>From the reflections about
and
, we see that
, and so, since the equal chords
and
subtend equal angles at
,
.
Hence
, with the result that
are collinear and
is an altitude.
Similarly,
and
are altitudes that contain
, and so their
point
of intersection must be the orthocentre.