http://dx.doi.org/10.4153/CMB-2011-182-0
Canad. Math. Bull. 56(2013), 225-228
Published:2011-10-05 Printed: Jun 2013
Amod Agashe, Department of Mathematics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, U.S.A.
Features coming soon:
Citations (via CrossRef)
Tools:
Search Google Scholar:
Abstract
Let $J$ be an abelian variety and
$A$ be an abelian subvariety of $J$, both defined over $\mathbf{Q}$.
Let $x$ be an element of $H^1(\mathbf{Q},A)$.
Then there are at least two definitions of $x$ being visible in $J$:
one asks that the torsor corresponding to $x$ be isomorphic over $\mathbf{Q}$
to a subvariety of $J$, and the other asks that $x$ be in the kernel
of the natural map $H^1(\mathbf{Q},A) \to H^1(\mathbf{Q},J)$. In this article, we
clarify the relation between the two definitions.
© Canadian Mathematical Society, 2013
|